Coos County Watchdog


  • Home >>>
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Links
    • Whistle-Blower’s Page
  • Blog >>>
    • Info Blogs
  • Issues >>>
    • Johnson Creek Dam
    • Jury Nullification >
      • Jury Nullification on Facebook
    • More Choices in Bandon
    • NO Bandon Marsh Expansion >
      • Bandon Marsh Expansion on Facebook
    • Second Amendment Sanctuary Ordinance >
      • S.A.S.O on FB
    • State of Jefferson >
      • State of Jefferson on Facebook
    • The Coos County Charter
    • Urban Renewal Information

Rebuttal to #CurryCounty Workers Pay Increase Article in Coastal Pilot 

9/10/2014

Comments

 
From a Watchdog in Curry County

Slipshod Reporting - Curry Coastal Pilot Article
July 2, 2014:


"County workers, officials get pay increase"

Re: July 2, 2014 news article "County workers, officials get pay increase."

When you read Commissioners Smith and Itzen stating that county employees haven't seen a pay
increase since 2009 then read page 1 of the Curry County Master Payroll Order stating otherwise, you
must be reading the Curry Coastal Pilot.  In fact, Sheriff Department staff (Teamsters) received raises
in four of the five years since 2009 according to the Master Payroll Orders.  Those increases exceeded
Social Security cost of living allowances (COLA's) by a factor of 4 to 1.

During the last three months (June to August) according to county meeting agendas and Clerk
Journal records, there have been over 25 transfers/promotions; pay increases; hires; rehires and
promotions.  Yes, 25: Some of the promotions are nearly $10,000/year.  This county is out of control! 
But, I digress. 

In addition to the expected deceptive, misleading and inaccurate opinions of County Commissioners,
the article includes an extraordinary number of false statements.All the documents referred to here
are available online at http://www.currycountytaxes.com/curry_county_taxes_004.htm
Listed below are nine LIES identified in the July 2 article.  Quotations taken from the article are in
"italics" followed by the FACTS. 

For those who have not received email updates from me before, thank you for taking the time to
review this information.  Please advise if you do not wish to receive future emails.  Thank you.

Tom Huxley
  

LIE #1: "Smith repeatedly said the 2.8 percent increase is …long overdue for county employees who

haven't seen a pay increase since 2009."


FACT #1: There were cost of living allowances (COLA's) and Step increases provided in the Master

Payroll Orders for 2010/2011; 2011/2012; 2012/2013; 2014/2015. 
 

LIE #2: "'Yet, if you look at inflation, the (cost of living) increases, minimum wage has increased,

Social Security - there have been other increases upward of 12 to 15 percent,' Smith said."

 
FACT #2: Wage increases (FACT #1) minus six percent (offset for employee PERS pickup) total

approximately 27 percent.  Social Security COLA's for the five years 2010 to 2014 total 6.8%. 
 

LIE #3: "The money, said County Commissioner David Itzen, will come from the general fund – and

will only make up for what employees have lost to inflation over the years."

FACT #3: Commissioner's reference to "since 2009" means 2010 forward.  See FACT #2:

 
LIE #4: "The county began spinning off entire departments into nonprofit organizations two years ago

to save money.  Part of those savings were realized in that the county no longer had to pay for PERS

for the employees who now work with the nonprofit."

FACT #4: The two large divestitures were for Home Health and Hospice and Public Health and

Human Services.  Neither of these departments was funded with general fund dollars.

LIE #5: "This is not a raise; it's a cost of living adjustment," Smith said.  "Did Social Security get a coat

(cost) of living adjustment this year?  Last year?  The year before that and the year before that?

Employees here at the county haven't."
 

FACT #5: Refer to FACT #1 and FACT #2.  Below is a Social Security breakdown by year compared

with the Master Payroll Orders.

Social Security COLA's                      Master Payroll Orders - Fiscal Year

January 2010 - 0.0%                             2010/2011   5.5% (COLA .5%:   Full Step 5%)

January 2011 - 0.0%                             2011/2012   5.9% (COLA .9%:   Full Step 5%)

January 2012 - 3.6%                             2012/2013   7.5% (COLA 2.5%: Full Step 5%)

January 2013 - 1.7%                             2013/2014   0.0%

January 2014 - 1.5%                             2014/2015 14.2% (COLA 2.8%: Full Step 5%: 6.4% PERS)
                                                                                           

Total:               6.8%                            Total:      27.1% (after subtracting 6% PERS)

LIE #6: "The fact of the matter is, we're the same team," he (Itzen) said.  "These employees have not

had a raise since 2009: inflation is eating them alive."

FACT #6: They just don't get it!  Obviously they have no conscience.  The taxpayers of Curry County

(especially those retired living on Social Security) are being eaten alive on oh so many fronts.

LIE #7: Reference is made to some employees receiving Step increases.  "The board considers such

increases every three years.  It's only fair, Smith argues, as commissioners took a 3 percent pay cut in

2011.  It's a fact," he said.  "It needs to be reported as a fact."

FACT #7: Please see FACT #5: The 3% pay cut Smith refers to reduced commissioner's gross pay by

$152/month.  The monthly cost for each commissioner was reduced from approximately $7,441 to

$7,340 or $101/month.  This was due in large part to an increase in the employer PERS contribution.

Smith was not even a commissioner in 2011. 

The total cost per year per commissioner dropped from $89,295 to $88,085.

 

LIE #8: "Itzen believes the COLA and PERS increases will not affect voters when they go to the polls

Sept. 16 to cast ballots regarding a proposed property tax increase of 68 cents per $1,000 to fund the

jail.  That would raise $1.2 million that usually comes out of the general fund…"

FACT #8: The approved 2014/2015 jail budget is about $1.2 million.  According to the ballot title, this

Sept. 16 property tax measure would raise approximately $1.65 million per year or nearly 40% more

than the current approved budget to run the jail.

March 10, 2014 when presenting a PowerPoint presentation to the Brookings City Council, Sheriff

Bishop showed (page 14 of the presentation) that if such a ballot measure were to pass, a

consolidation of 911 services could "…save up to an additional $500,000 (per year)…"

Furthermore, "This has the potential to take 1.5 million from public safety and return to the

General Fund for other parts of the county."  Has this $500,000/year carrot been forgotten?
 

LIE #9: "Our goal is to keep our core of the best employees in county.  If our pay is the lowest in the

state, we're not going to be able to keep them (Itzen said)." 
 

FACT #9: Privatize many of the services currently provided.  Reduce excessive benefit packages.



Comments

Port of #CoosBay Blowing Through Your Tax Dollars Like Drunken Sailors 

9/8/2014

Comments

 

As reported in the Register Guard: 

The Oregon International Port of Coos Bay recently hired Paola Avola, Brooke Walton, Makenzie Marineau and Linet Samson at the Port’s administrative office in Coos Bay and Mike Fisher and Wes Wear in Charleston. Avola brings more than 25 years of experience in financial management to her role as the port’s new finance manager. She previously worked as a senior accountant for the Petaluma Health Center and, most recently, as business analyst for the multi-jurisdictional Sonoma County Library in Santa Rosa, Calif. Walton was hired as communications manager. She previously owned and operated two businesses in the Coos Bay-North Bend area. Marineau joined the communications team as a communications specialist. She worked in communications and volunteer management in higher education, the nonprofit sector and politics. Samson was hired as office manager. She has a background in healthcare administration and as a consultant for small business owners and nonprofit organizations.
http://registerguard.com/rg/business/31869787-76/story.csp
Related Posts:
Commissioners Campaign Contributors are Champions of Corporate Welfare
Yes to LNG, No to the CEP
MGX---Controversial Alliance for Progress Co-Founder Donates to Sweet Campaign
#CoosBay Uses Urban Renewal Money for Confederate Tribe Private Development
Bribed Surgeons Implanted Counterfeit Medical Devices into Patients 
MGX---County Assessor has Real Disconnect on Community Enhancement Plan
#Coquille & #MyrtlePoint School Districts Among Worst at Utilizing Public Funding
BOC---Cowardly, Commissioners Cribbins & Sweet Betray the Voters of Coos County 
Unanswered Questions about the South Coast Community Foundation
MGX---CEP/SCCF will Impact ALL of Oregon
AFP---Information on the CEP/SCCF Presentation at the Red Lion on May 1, 2014
Letter to Editor---SCCF Should pay for Coos Bay Sewer Upgrades
Letter to Editor---Promises in the Dark with the Jordan Cove Project
BOC---Public Meetings Coos County Planning Changing Land Use Laws
Letter to Editor---County Politicians Keeping Public in the Dark on SCCF
RPCC---Republican Monthly Meeting "Candidate Forum" April 24, 2014
Critique of the BOC Town Hall in Bandon---"PUT IT ON THE BALLOT"
BOC---Public Meetings on South Coast Community Foundation "Put it on the Ballot"

BOC---Public Meeting for Vote on South Coast Community Foundation April 1, 2014

Letter to Editor---South Coast Community Foundation Scam will Top All Past 
MGX---Geddry Slams Koch over Forced Cooperation & Jordon Cove Funding 
League of Oregon Cities Class of Slanted View on History of Urban Renewal in OR 
City of Bandon---Expanding Government Cheese

Comments

American Lands Council Meeting Host Ken Ivory Saturday, September 13, 2014

9/7/2014

Comments

 

Meeting in Baker County Call # on Flyer to receive for Address

Related Posts:
Forest Access for All Responds to #USDA, #BLM, #USFS on Blue Mountain Closures
Explosive Minority Report~Billionaires Club Supporting the Environmental Movement
Oregonian Prints Article on Landowners & Eminent Domain for #JordanCove
NOAA Official Responds to Public Request for Answers on NMS Nomination Process
Letter to Editor---To Officials of Bandon, Discuss Coordination on the Marine Reserve 
BLM, USFWS, USFS, Using ESA to Intimidate, Bully & Threaten Citizens Rights 
Letter to Editor---Facts to Dispense with Reckless Claims of Local Paper on Sanctuary 
Federal Legislation To Protect Oceans from Executive Overreach H.R. 4988 
Alarming Article on the Encroachment of the National Marine Sanctuary
The Port Orford Reorganized Fishermen Association Opposes Marine Sanctuary 
NOAA---Implementing Presidents Ocean Zoning Plan & Expanding Marine Sanctuary
NOAA---Updates Nominating Process for New National Marine Sanctuaries 
NOAA Official Responds to Public Request for Answers on NMS Nomination Process
Wrangling Over Water~The Story of the Johnson Creek Damn in #CoosCounty 

Comments

#NDAA Action Alert~Lane County BOC Voting on Ordinance Options for #Oathkeepers

9/7/2014

Comments

 
Picture
Calling all Oath Keepers
Support Lane County Ordinance Against NDAA 2012 and the unconstitutional provisions 1021 & 1022 which allows government to detain Americans without due process of the law for any reason.
Tuesday, September 9th at 9:00am in Harris Hall 125 E 8th Ave., Eugene, Oregon

 Those coming from northern Oregon, we will meet at the Original Breakfast restaurant in Albany at. 7:50 am sharp and leave at 8am sharp.
Please read the below info and send emails to the Commissioners to show your support for the ordinance:

Dear PANDA~Oregon Supporters,

I met with Lane County’s Vice Chair Commissioner Faye Stewart on Tuesday, where he told me that Steve Dingle, the county’s legal counsel, will be presenting his analysis of the proposed ordinance (RCGO) at this upcoming September 9th BCC meeting. I have submitted 2 pages of legal clarifications addressing the concerns previously made by the county’s legal counsel to the Commissioners. Faye Stewart and Jay Bozievich have both forwarded these clarifications to Steve Dingle for review and consideration. After Mr. Dingle’s presentation of his analysis of the RCGO at the upcoming BCC meeting on Tuesday, September 9th, he will make several recommendations for the commissioners to choose from. These recommendations will roughly include the following:

1) Have a vote to pass the ordinance as it stands

2) Continuing to work on drafting an effective ordinance.

3) No further action at this time (kills any progress on the ordinance!)

Three votes are needed from the Commissioners to approve one of these options. PANDA~Oregon would accept either of the first two options. Option 3 would kill any chance for an ordinance dead in its tracks, and it would be very unlikely they’d spend the time to review another. I’m recommending that everyone e-mail the Commissioners asking them to “pass an ordinance that prohibits the utilization of the law of war in lane county authorized by the NDAA”.

The Commissioners:
i. Jay Bozievich – Jay.Bozievich@co.lane.or.us

ii. Sid Leiken – Sid.leiken@co.lane.or.us

iii. Pete Sorenson – Pete.sorenson@co.lane.or.us

iv. Pat Farr – Pat.Farr@co.lane.or.us

v. Faye Stewart – Faye.Stewart@co.lane.or.us

I’m also asking that all of those who are willing and able to come to this Tuesdays, September 9th BCC meeting at 9:00 am, to join me in solidarity and for additional public comments, emphasizing the importance of the ordinance and requesting that progress on its passage continues. Contact me if you want to speak during the public comments section and want any guidance in what to say.

Please review my legal clarifications that I have posted below so you can be aware of any misleading or hollow arguments that may be made by the legal counsel during their analysis. Depending on all your support and action before and on Tuesday, September 9th at 9:00am in Harris Hall (125 E 8th Ave., Eugene), it may be the final stand against the unconstitutional provisions of the 2012 NDAA in Lane County. Thanks again for all of your support and action over this past year and lets continue our legal fight to restore our Constitutional governance, defend our local sovereignty, and to protect our Constitutional rights.

P.S. Please forward this letter to all those who may be interested.
Colin Farnsworth

PANDA ~ Oregon State Coordinator
Oregon.Against.NDAA@gmail.com

Legal clarifications are below:

Legal Clarification 1/2

Overarching Question:  How will someone know they’re breaking the law under the RCGO?

1a) Ordinance Text: Prohibition of the Laws of War in Lane County

(1)a. arrest or capture any person in Lane County, or citizen of Lane County within the United States, with the intent of “detention under the law of war,”
1b) Question Response: All persons must question and be assured that any “arrest”, “capture”, or “detention” is valid, officially warranted, and has and/or will follow the legal civilian criminal due process outlined by ORS Chapter 133 — Arrest and Related Procedures; Search and Seizure; Extradition, or other sections of ORS as applicable, as well as the expectations of due process under the U.S. and Oregon Constitutions.

2a) Ordinance Text: Prohibition of the Laws of War in Lane County

(1)b. actually subject a person in Lane County to “disposition under the law of war,”
2b) Question Response: All persons must question and be assured that civilian criminal due process is and/or will be followed, outlined by ORS Chapter 133 — Arrest and Related Procedures; Search and Seizure; Extradition, or other sections of ORS as applicable, as well as the expectations of due process under the U.S. and Oregon Constitutions. Any implementation/disposition of the “law of war” in Lane County is unconstitutional with the lawful exception of those serving “in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger” (Ex Parte Milligan, 71 U.S. 2, 1866).

3a) Ordinance Text: Prohibition of the Laws of War in Lane County

(1)c. subject any person to targeted killing in Lane County, or citizen of Lane County within the United States,
3b) Question Response: All persons must question and be assured actions have not and/or will not lead to “target killing” and any application of physical/deadly force strictly follows the civilian criminal due process outlined by ORS Chapter 161 — General Provisions: Justification 161.190 – 161.275 (i.e. “Use of physical force generally,” “Use of physical force in making an arrest or in preventing an escape,” and “Use of deadly physical force in making an arrest or in preventing an escape”) or other sections of the ORS as applicable, as well as the expectations of due process under the U.S. and Oregon Constitutions.

4a) Ordinance Text: Prohibition of the Laws of War in Lane County

(1)d. assist and/or use any county resources in the implementation of any of the unlawful acts above. 4b) Question Response: All persons must question and be assured that their assistance or use of county resources does not and/or will not aid or assist any of the ordinances prohibited actions that fall outside the guidelines for civilian criminal due process, outlined by the various chapters and sections of the ORS, as well as the expectations of due process under the U.S. and Oregon Constitutions. All Persons requested to assist in anyway the implementation of prohibited actions under this ordinance should also consider to what degree their assistance may be prosecutable by the guidelines of Chapter 161 – General Provision: Criminal Liability; Parties to Crime (i.e. 161.155 Criminal liability for the conduct of another).

Conclusion: "Ignorance of the law excuses no one". Residents and public servants are governed by the same laws and should be equally applied to both whether the individuals care to know about them or not. Public servants, especially those who swore an Oath of Office, should be held to a higher standard of knowing about Constitutional rights and the guidelines for civil and criminal due process outlined in the Oregon Revised Statues, Article Three of the U.S Constitution, and the Constitution of this state. If the ordinance is passed, it is advised that a letter of notification be distributed to all county personnel notifying them of its implications and its importance to protect the civilian due process of all persons in Lane County.

RCGO Legal Clarification 2/2 1) All persons must question and be assured that any information, resources, or support provided to another entity is for criminal/civil due process purposes only, and not for the implementation of the “law of war”. All persons would be prohibited to assist in any policing or extrajudicial policing outside the guidelines of ORS civil and criminal due process procedures, and the expectations of due process provided by the U.S. and Oregon Constitutions.

2) Request for county assistants in providing private/personal information on residents must provide a judicial warrant, and not just an executive authorization.

3) Arrests, capture, detention, search and seizures must be legally warranted and executed by legal federal or local agencies:

i.e. DHS, FBI, ATF, IRS

i.e. not: US armed forces, military tribunals and judicial system (Except service members in time of war. Ex Parte Milligan, 71 U.S. 2, 1866)

4) The RCGO wouldn’t effect any cooperative agreement, grants, or joint task forces, until they began to illegally implement the “law of war”, or bypass the process of civilian due process outlined in the ORS. If sued or stripped of monetary incentives by the federal government, Lane County would have standing for a counter suit proving the “law of war” on American soil.

5) The broadness and flexibility of the RCGO’s definitions, is directly correlated with the broadness and flexibility of the language used in section 1021 of the NDAA relating to the “law of war” and the AUMF. Arguments claiming the RCGO is “facially unconstitutional” would have to be similarly applied to the identical language in section 1021 of the 2012 NDAA.

6) The RCGO wouldn’t breach the parameters of free speech, prohibiting the assistance to any implementation of the “law of war”. Public servants who are often trusted to sensitive and private information concerning residents are often held to confidentiality agreements unless a warrant is received.
--
Colin Farnsworth
PANDA ~ Oregon State Coordinator
Oregon.Against.NDAA@gmail.com
Feel free to contact us at anytime for more information or visit:

1) PANDA ~ Oregon Youtube channel

http://www.youtube.com/channel/UCvVPBv-oZoli5NnE_MC6BRQ

2)PANDA ~ Oregon Facebook page

www.facebook.com/pandaOR1776

3) PANDA’s National website:

www.PANDAunite.org


In Liberty,
Tom McKirgan
Oath Keeper
Southern Oregon Coordinator
"Not On Our Watch"
http://oroathkeepers.org
Related Posts:
NDAA---Lane County Moves to Pass Ordinance Against Federal Indefinite Detention 
SCOTUS---Supremes Refused to Hear Legal Challenges to the NDAA 
NDAA---Lane County BOC Public Hearing & Comments on RCGI April 15, 2014
Oath Keepers Public Meeting in Coos Bay February 22, 2014
TEA Party---Video of Brookings TEA Party January 18, 2014
RCGI---Time to Support Oath Keepers & Make a Public Comment to The World
RCGI---Open Letter to OR State Representative Wayne Krieger
RCGI---Douglas and Lane County Lobby our Senators against NDAA
RCGI---The Jim Bice Radio Show with Stewart Rhodes founder of Oath Keepers 
ATF---It’s time to submit comments on proposed NFA rule changes!
RCGR----The New NDAA will cost YOU $5,700
RCGR---Legislative Defense Manual
If You Value Your Liberties, Stay Out of Coos Bay, Oregon!
RCGR---Coos Bay City Council Rejects Promise of Federalism and Oath
City of Coos Bay---City Council Meeting Votes to adopt RCGR September 17, 2013
RCG Resolution Against the NDAA 2012----Updated 9/7/2013
Obama administration hiding info on targeted killings of Americans - senator
THE U.N. & LOCAL AGENDA 21
THE U.N. & AGENDA 21:

Comments

Commissioners Campaign Contributors are Champions of Corporate Welfare

9/4/2014

Comments

 
September 2, 2014  

Commissioners Campaign Contributors are Champions of Corporate Welfare

Picture

 Can campaign donors define a candidate?  It should be no revelation that the main contributors to the John Sweet reelection campaign are also the main supporters of government economic development in Coos County.

Private business is the only real engine of economic development and the creator of all jobs that actually produce.  Government “economic development” programs take profits from companies and people that are legitimately generating revenue on the open market and redirects that money to nongovernmental organizations using taxing schemes designed to accumulate these discretionary funds.  The NGO’s are usually under the authority of career politicians and bureaucrats, who will use these slush funds to buy favors from corporations, unions and cronies---all while promising new jobs.   

The proper term for manipulating the market so private business can receive public funding is “corporate welfare,” which is a type of “economic fascism.”  The reason it is fascist is that a government subsidized economic system destroys the competitive market with unnatural imbalances.  This destruction forms an artificial market of compensation where the politicians control the flow of these hijacked revenue streams.  Those who direct the flow of this public money get to decide which businesses do and do not receive the funding, thus giving government officials the ability to pick the winners and losers.  Too much of this type of market manipulation will force businesses to compete for government compensation and not for the satisfaction of their customers, so the quality of manufacturing and customer service will suffer. 

Picture
Using taxing tools to incentivize businesses, like urban renewal, enterprise zones, and the infamous Community Enhancement Plan, has become very controversial.  No coincidence many of the same people and groups who promote these forms of “corporate welfare” are also donors to John Sweet’s reelection campaign.  As a commissioner, he has voted in favor of all the previously mentioned tools of government economic sustainability and promises to continue to do so, if reelected---no matter how detrimental to the county’s financial stability. 

Some of the contributors to John Sweet’s campaign include the usual suspects.  Jon Barton, who donated $500, is a board member of the (South Coast Development Council).  The co-founder of the (Coos County Alliance for Progress), John Knutson, contributed $2,000.  Sweet’s campaign received $5,000 in contributions from the (Coalition for a Healthy Oregon), which is an association of eight Medicaid managed care organizations


Picture Fred Messerle & John Sweet
Sweet is a registered Republican and a self-proclaimed fiscal conservative, yet the very progressive Democratic Senator from Oregon’s ninth district, Caddy McKeown, donated $250 to his reelection bid, which should prove that his attachment to the public purse string is much stronger than party politics or personal beliefs.  It would also explain why the local Republican Party is not supporting his candidacy. 

Despite the reputation of his contributors, Commissioner Sweet’s decisions and votes while serving on the Board of Commissioners should be enough to illustrate that his loyalties align with the highly subsidized special interest groups, over the concerns of the average citizen, so his actions alone should be enough for the voter to define him properly.

CoosCountyWatchdog.com is a virtual network of government watchdogs founded by Rob Taylor.  
Related Posts:

Officials Obscuring Facts on the Bandon Marsh Mosquito Infestation
Yes to LNG, No to the CEP
#USFWS Admits Fault for the Bandon Mosquito Infestation
GROUP IN NEED OF DONATIONS
The Bandon Marsh Mosquito Farm
The Republican Party of Coos County Should Take a Stand
The Ghost of Tricky Dick
The Better Candidates for the Port of Bandon
Public Meetings on Agenda 21
Support SB478
NO on Measure 6-148 The Bandon Lighting Ordinance
City of Bandon---Outdoor Lighting Ordinance Measure 6-148
Bandon: The City of Ordinances
Keep the Lights ON in Bandon
Public Law 107-40
The National Defense Authorization Act of 2013
The National Fish & Wildlife Foundation
The US Forest Service Is Involved With Another Land Grab in Coos County 
My choices for the Ballot in the General Election of November 2012
The Voice of the Voters
The Administrator
Matt Rowe for Mayor Rally
“Coos County Today”
Silent victory over Urban Renewal in Coos County
There was an incident at the Fair.
The Realm of Business

Comments

BOC~#CoosCounty Mosquito Control Meeting September 4, 2014

9/4/2014

Comments

 
Hey Folks,

Mosquito meeting in Bandon, but the notice did not go out until the day of the meeting.  Is there a reason the officials are not advertising these public meetings?  Inquiring minds.......Rob T.   
From:  Matt Winkel (citymanager@ci.bandon.or.us) This sender is in your contact list. Sent: Thu 9/04/14 9:00 AM To: City Manager (citymanager@ci.bandon.or.us)
Picture
COOS COUNTY VECTOR ASSESSMENT & CONTROL ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA

THURSDAY SEPTEMBER 4, 2014

5:30 – 7:00 p.m.

 

Bandon Conference and Community Center (aka Bandon Barn)

1200 W   11th St.  SW Bandon OR 


5:30 – 5:35      Roll Call & Approve minutes of 8/14/14 meeting

5:35 – 5:50      Staff Report

5:50 – 6:00      Bat House Program

6:00 – 6:15      Event Planning

6:15 – 6:30      Mapping Project Approval

6:30 – 6:40      What do we do after the Mosquito Season

6:40 – 6:55      Public Comment

6:55 – 7:00      Committee Member Comment

7:00                 Adjourn


Related Posts:
Officials Obscuring Facts on the Bandon Marsh Mosquito Infestation
#USFWS Admits Fault for the Bandon Mosquito Infestation
GROUP IN NEED OF DONATIONS
Letter to Editor---LNG Should Learn from Mosquito Problem on Kentuck Restoration
BOC---County Skeeter Meeting Wednesday June 25, 2014
Someone should have told the USFWS the Three Reasons Mosquitoes Suck
The Bandon Marsh Mosquito Farm
Mosquito Armageddon:  One Mosquito Bite Can Change a Life Forever
BOC---County Mosquito Meeting Wednesday, June 11, 2014
BOC---County Mosquito Meeting in Bandon Thursday, May 29, 2014  
American Mosquito Control Association Information on Mosquito Management
A Picture is Worth a 1000 Words
Contact Information to Make an Official Mosquito Report in Bandon  
USFWS---Coos County Public Health Joint Press Release Bandon Marsh Mosquitoes
Natural Resources Committee Protecting the Rights of Property Owners from USFWS
USFWS---Bandon Mosquito Infestation was a Figment of the Imagination
USFWS---Moving Forward at the Bandon Marsh Mosquito Preserve
BOC---Public Meeting Vector Assessment & Control Advisory Committee May 1, 2014
Letter to Editor---They're Back, The Mosquitoes are here....
USFWS---Public Comment Integrated Marsh Management in Bandon by April 9, 2014
BOC---Shared State-County Services and Mosquito Abatement
USFWS---Post Card & News Release on Bandon Marsh Mosquito EA March 11, 2014 
USFWS---Public Comment & Meeting for Bandon Mosquito Control March 18, 2014

Comments

Letter to Editor~So Good Douglas County Should Enact "Voice of the Voters" Charter 

9/3/2014

Comments

 
Picture
  To the Editor of The Coos County Watchdog

“We the People” is the way the preamble to our Constitution starts. I always liked the sound of that, but where have “We the People” gone? Some no longer vote or consider the need to participate in any way. Only a Few will become candidates to serve in political positions.

The design of the Founders was for volunteer service. Volunteer service requires that we maintain awareness and have interest in the affairs of government. It is also a way to keep government within reasonable bounds.

The best opportunity to serve in government is local or city and the next best is your County government.

Thanks to two Coos County residents, who want to enhance a “We the People”

Governing of Coos County, a new charter has been developed. The aim of the Charter is to put people in control. Voter approval would be required for;

1) Capitol programs, 2) All bonded indebtedness, 3) The gifting of Public funds, 4) The granting of property tax exemptions; and more.

Voter approval would be required for Urban Renewal. Accountability for use of Urban Renewal funds will require public presentation on a County website with full disclosure of the disbursement of Urban Renewal funds

Budgeting will be zero based, which means that they will be based on the cost of service delivery for the coming period.

Voters in Coos County should get well acquainted with this Home Rule Proposal in order to make an informed decision on it. It is much better than I had expected.

If approved by the voters, Coos County could become a destination for new investment. People who want to have more control over their lives will consider establishing themselves in Coos County. Coos County could become the envy of the Nation by shining daylight on the operation of government.

Sign me as consumed with envy in Douglas County!

Merv Cloe
Reedsport, OR

Related Posts:
ARRRG~Public Meetings to Discuss the #CoosCounty Charter "Voice of the Voters"
ARRRG Voice of the Voters Home Rule Charter Officially Filed for November Ballot
News with Views Editor Special Guest Speaker for Patriots Gathering July 19, 2014 
Letter to Editor---Curry County Charter does not equal Coos County Charter
BOC---Shared State-County Services and Mosquito Abatement
Letter to Editor---Jordon Cove Expects Tax Relief 
Agenda 21---Sustainable Development & Regionalism
Community Vs. Collectivism
Regionalism - The Blueprint for Your Serfdom
Letter to Editor---WHY DID THE CHARTER BALLOT MEASURE 6-143 NOT PASS?

BOC---Regulatory Streamlining and why they want an Administrator
MGX---a few links to some very informative articles from Mary Geddry
City of Bandon---Votes on the renewal of City Manager's Contract
MGX---"Change the title of the administrator to 'director' and the problem is solved."
BOC---Regulatory Streamlining and why they want an Administrator
Letter to Editor------Feckless or Hypocritical
MGX---Spinmeisters at The World newspaper.....
Audit report 2012-17‏
MGX---plans underway to dismantle county government‏
Jackson County regional planning gets green light---Regionalization coming to Coos
News with Views Editor Special Guest 

Comments

#ODFW~Popular Charleston boat ramp re-opens for fall salmon angling Sept. 2, 2014

9/3/2014

Comments

 
Picture
Popular boat ramp re-opens for fall salmon angling September 2, 2014

CHARLESTON, Ore. – There is good news for Millicoma River anglers: the popular Rooke-Higgins boat ramp re-opened in time for fall Chinook angling. The boat ramp is on the upper tidewater section of the river about seven miles east of the city of Coos Bay.

The ramp closed a few years ago when a lease between the former landowner and Coos County expired. The Oregon Department of Fish and Wild obtained Sport Fish Restoration grants from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and a Boating Facilities grant from the Oregon State Marine Board to purchase the property for public access and boat launching.

The Coos County Parks Department made upgrades and repairs, including replacing the bumper rails, clearing accumulated mud from the lower ramp, and installing new signs. The county also will manage the facility and hopes to replace the restrooms and floats in the future.

Anglers will have greater access to the fall Chinook salmon in the Coos Basin now that the boat ramp has re-opened. The fall fishery began in mid-August in the lower bay and moves toward upper tidewater with the rains of late September and early October. The fish eventually make their way to freshwater streams to spawn in late fall and winter.

The mission of the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife is to protect and enhance Oregon's fish and wildlife and their habitats for use and enjoyment by present and future generations. The agency consists of the Oregon Fish and Wildlife Commission, a commission-appointed director and a statewide staff of about 950 permanent employees. Headquartered in Salem, ODFW has regional offices in Clackamas and Roseburg with ten district offices located throughout the state. Visit www.odfw.com.

###

Contact:
Mike Gray, ODFW (541) 888-5515
Larry Robison, Coos County (541) 396-7759
Fax: (541) 673-0372


Related Posts:
Wrangling Over Water~The Story of the Johnson Creek Damn in #CoosCounty
ODFW---Fish and Wildlife Commission sends ODFW budget to Governor, Too Much
Weyerhaeuser Offers Company Forestland for Recreational Access 
ODFW---Letter to Hunters on an All-Out Ban on Lead Ammo-Public Comment Needed
OFF---Ban on Lead Ammo Is on the Horizon
ODFW--- Adopt the Coastal Multi-Species Conservation and Management plan
ODFW---Public Comments on Proposed 2015-17 Budget by July 17, 2014
ODFW---Commission Public Meeting Multi-Species Conservation Plan April 25, 2014
ODFW---Public meetings on big game, game bird, and furbearer regulations
ODFW---Public Comment for Coastal Multi-Species Conservation & Management Plan
OWEB Grant Request by The Nature Conservancy 2013
Fishing Alert---The State is forcing a reduction in certain fish populations, Why?
ODFW---A bright outlook for ocean salmon seasons
ODFW---Ice fishing on Diamond Lake
ODFW---Parking permits now required at nine ODFW Wildlife Areas
ODFW---Buy hunting/fishing licenses now
ODFW---Gray whales are migrating along the Oregon Coast
Letter to Editor Eel Lake trade by Bob Main 12-07-2012
Oregon Fish & Wildlife Meeting Subject: EEL LAKE/COQUILLE VALLEY LAND EXCHANGE
Comments

City of Bandon Looking for New City Manager, September 8, 2014

9/3/2014

Comments

 
Picture
City of Bandon

PUBLIC FORUM
Monday, September 8, 2014, at 7:00 PM,
CITY MANAGER SEARCH

QUALIFICATIONS AND CHARACTERISTICS

Interested parties are invited and encouraged to attend a Public Forum which is being held to solicit input into the desired qualifications and characteristics for a new City Manager to replace retiring City Manager Matt Winkel.  The forum will be facilitated by a representative from the Prothman Company, a consulting firm under contract with the City to assist in recruiting applicants for this position.  The Public Forum will be conducted during the regular City Council meeting on Monday, September 8, 2014, at 7:00 PM, in the Bandon City Council Chambers at City Hall.


Recent History of Bandon Government:

The following file contains a charter that was put on the ballot back in 2004.  It will give an example of why some citizens of Bandon would like to see a structural change in city government.   Some citizens would like to take the current "Administrative" form of government and replace it with something more "Representative" of the people. 

On another note, there is an effort to change Coos County into an "Administrative" form of government. 
CFRG Citizens for Responsive government 1-2004
File Size: 1931 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File

Related Posts:
City of Bandon---Votes on the renewal of City Manager's Contract
Bribed Surgeons Implanted Counterfeit Medical Devices into Patients 
City of Bandon---Expanding Government Cheese
The International Code Council and You...
B-Corporations: The Redefining of what it means to be a Corporation 
Cities are using Monopoly Utilities to Game the System 
Action Alert:---State Legislation SB 478
The Federalization of Local Urban Renewal Agencies
SOS OR Counties 2012 Financial Condidtion Review 2012-17
Agenda 21---Sustainable Development & Regionalism

Comments

Officials Obscuring Facts on the Bandon Marsh Mosquito Infestation

9/2/2014

Comments

 
Picture
August 25, 2014,

Officials Obscuring Facts on the Bandon Marsh Mosquito Infestation

The saga of The Bandon Marsh National Wildlife Refuge & Mosquito Preserve is continuing to unfold as the people of the Coquille Valley are learning to live with what the US Fish & Wildlife Service is calling an “acceptable” amount of mosquitoes.     

Of course, there are differences of opinion on the term “acceptable.” 

The officials at Bullards Beach State Park, which is next to the Bandon Marsh, released this advisory in July of 2014, “US Fish and Wildlife Service has been applying larvacide to the Bandon Marsh since early May.  The larvacide has reduced the saltwater mosquito population significantly.  Due to the dry conditions this year the drainage ditches at Bullards Beach have been dry for at least a month.  As a result we have seen very few of our “normal” mosquitoes, but a few are present.  Coos County Health Department has traps set up at the park to monitor the mosquito population.”

What is “normal” and who decides those standards based on what evidence?

It is true there are fewer mosquitoes than there was during last year’s infestation.  Nonetheless, some properties surrounding the marsh are still suffering “swarm levels” of significant proportions that did not exist until The Service pulled the tide gates on the Ni-les-tuna section of the marsh and flooded the valley.  Thankfully, the temporary suspension of the second phase of the planned expansion stopped the formation of 4500-acres worth of breeding ponds.

Beginning in the spring of 2014, certain parts of the city of Bandon has, and continues to experience, a small influx of mosquitoes, which is more than there were before the first phase of the expansion was completed.  The decrease from the previous year is due to the direct treatment of the infested area on the marsh, so the problem is somewhat managed, but it has by no means been eliminated.  According to the experts, the application of larvacides and pesticides could continue for the next 6 years, or indefinitely, depending on nature’s ability to produce enough natural predators to kill off the mosquitoes. 

The government officials assigned with solving this dilemma have chosen to treat the symptoms, instead of curing the disease.  Dredging new channels combined with the expense of continuous vector abatement will eventually cost several millions in public funding.  Outside the marsh, the private sector is suffering infestations from previous fly offs and there is some concern among the professionals on whether there will ever be enough mosquito predators in the higher elevations of the valley to control the insect populations, which will permanently devalue the quality of life for those residents.. 

Alarmingly, there are different varieties of mosquitoes starting to appear in other parts of the valley and in the city of Bandon besides the summer salt marsh mosquito, the Aedes dorsalis.  The Service is blaming standing water on private property for these new bugs, but the fact remains, these insects were not present until The Service flooded the marsh.  No matter how they try to obscure the issue, the topic should be about solutions, not public housing for bats and mosquito magnets.  How many different species there are is hard to determine since the officials have only five traps actively collecting mosquitoes in the infested part of the county.  A PhD Biologist, who is also a member of the county mosquito committee, recommended at least fifty traps.  Is there a reason the officials do not want this data collected? 

Ten leading American biologists in the field of vector abatement were asked in a phone survey if the Service’s Integrated Marsh Management plan would be effective for this specific situation.  Only six responded with “more than likely”, three said “maybe”, and one claimed that it would not be a good solution.  The same ten biologists were asked if diking the marsh and draining the swamp would solve the problem, and without hesitation, all of them said, “yes”.  All ten agreed that removing the standing water, is, and has always been, the most cost effective way to eliminate mosquitoes without having to use toxic chemicals on a perpetual basis and history has proven it.  Why has there been no discussion on using this established alternative?   

The county’s inaction is the fault of the county commissioner in charge of resolving this issue, John Sweet.  Sweet had an opportunity to take the question to the voters, but refused to put it on the ballot.  He was late in forming the Vector Assessment & Control Advisory Committee and once formed, he appointed members of the community who are sympathetic with the agenda of the USFWS.  It is no accident, nor surprise, the committee overwhelmingly decided to back Fish & Wildlife and support the agency’s IMM plan

Currently, Sweet is an incumbent desperately campaigning to retain his seat on the Coos County Board of Commissioners, which has proven difficult with an opponent as experienced and well respected in the community as Mr. Don Gurney, who is also running for the same position. 

Mr. Gurney has openly stated that he would support a ballot measure asking the citizens of Coos County to determine how they would resolve the problem.  Integrated Marsh Management plan, or Dike the Marsh and Drain the Swamp, most voters would support the ladder and that is why Sweet refuses to use the power of the people to smite The US Fish & Wildlife Service.  Those same voters should support Gurney in November. 

CoosCountyWatchdog.com is a virtual network of government watchdogs founded by Rob Taylor. 


Related Posts:
Yes to LNG, No to the CEP
#USFWS Admits Fault for the Bandon Mosquito Infestation
GROUP IN NEED OF DONATIONS
The Bandon Marsh Mosquito Farm
The Republican Party of Coos County Should Take a Stand
The Ghost of Tricky Dick
The Better Candidates for the Port of Bandon
Public Meetings on Agenda 21
Support SB478
NO on Measure 6-148 The Bandon Lighting Ordinance
City of Bandon---Outdoor Lighting Ordinance Measure 6-148
Bandon: The City of Ordinances
Keep the Lights ON in Bandon
Public Law 107-40
The National Defense Authorization Act of 2013
The National Fish & Wildlife Foundation
The US Forest Service Is Involved With Another Land Grab in Coos County 
My choices for the Ballot in the General Election of November 2012
The Voice of the Voters
The Administrator
Matt Rowe for Mayor Rally
“Coos County Today”
Silent victory over Urban Renewal in Coos County
There was an incident at the Fair.
The Realm of Business
Comments
Forward>>

    Categories

    All
    A.F.P.
    Agenda 21
    Bandon
    B.I.A.
    B.L.M.
    Coos Bay
    Coos County
    Coos County
    Coquille
    County Charter
    Curry County
    C.W.A.
    Democratic Party
    D.E.Q.
    Eco Devo
    Eco Devo
    Economic Development
    Educational
    Elections
    E.P.A.
    F.D.A.
    F.E.M.A.
    Individual Rights
    I Spy Radio
    Jury Nullification
    Legislation
    Letter To Editor
    Mary Geddry
    N.D.A.A.
    News Wave
    N.O.A.A.
    North Bend
    O&C Land
    O.D.F.W.
    O.D.O.T.
    O.F.F.
    O.H.A.
    O.P.R.D.
    O.R.C. Mining
    O.W.E.B.
    P.E.R.S.
    Petitions
    Port Of Coos Bay
    Public Comments
    Public Events
    Regulation
    Republican Party
    S.A.O.V.A.
    State Of Jefferson
    The Bandon Marsh
    The Economy
    The Rob Taylor Report
    The Supreme Court
    The Tea Party
    Urban Renewal
    U.S.A.C.E.
    U.S.D.A.
    U.S.F.S
    U.S.F.W.S.

    Sign-Up Now to Stay Informed

    * indicates required

    View previous campaigns.

    Send Letters to:
    ​cooscountywatchdog@gmail.com​

    Disclaimer: Letters to the Editor and other opinions published in The Coos County Watchdog blog are not necessarily the views of the Editor, Publisher, or possible anyone else in their right mind.  The Watchdog reserves the right to edit, omit, or copy any and all submissions. 
    Letters to the Editor must be attributed with a name, address, and contact phone number. 

    WARNING:
    Political correctness is not practiced on this
    page & some content is inappropriate

    RSS Feed


    Archives

    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.
Photo used under Creative Commons from DieselDemon