Did you read the governing contract document between the San Francisco law firm and the city of Coos Bay regarding the wastewater treatment facility that was published by The World? By far the best contract structure that safeguards the interests of a Seller Consultant (in this case the law firm) that I have read since I started my career as a young pup contracting specialist for QANTAS, the Australian airline, too many years ago. I would have plagiarized the content for my US and off shore consulting agreements in later years.
Suchadeal!! You probably noted that the lawyer may bill his $650 (discounted from $795) / hour rate forever. There is no maximum amount specified in the contract. The only thing related to the lawyer’s effort and not billable appears to be the dog walker for his puppy. Apparently there is a related and separate contract with an environmental consulting firm that The World did not publish - probably because they were not aware that the contract may exist.
When all done, the contract obligates the lawyer to provide “legal advice regarding wastewater treatment issues” to the city. However, in the lengthy contract boiler plate (terms and conditions of the contract) the lawyer is only obligated to deliver “contemporaneous ideas”; the law firm does not “guarantee or ensure any result or opinion”.
Say what Councilman Daily? A bunch of taxpayer’s money being spent for a legal opinion that at best is labeled “ideas”. Will the city rely on those ideas in future wastewater matters? What’s next? Please tell us why this is an ohsopeachy deal for the citizen taxpayers; and, please release any other related contract documents to The World for publishing.
Fred Kirby
Coos Bay
Suchadeal!! You probably noted that the lawyer may bill his $650 (discounted from $795) / hour rate forever. There is no maximum amount specified in the contract. The only thing related to the lawyer’s effort and not billable appears to be the dog walker for his puppy. Apparently there is a related and separate contract with an environmental consulting firm that The World did not publish - probably because they were not aware that the contract may exist.
When all done, the contract obligates the lawyer to provide “legal advice regarding wastewater treatment issues” to the city. However, in the lengthy contract boiler plate (terms and conditions of the contract) the lawyer is only obligated to deliver “contemporaneous ideas”; the law firm does not “guarantee or ensure any result or opinion”.
Say what Councilman Daily? A bunch of taxpayer’s money being spent for a legal opinion that at best is labeled “ideas”. Will the city rely on those ideas in future wastewater matters? What’s next? Please tell us why this is an ohsopeachy deal for the citizen taxpayers; and, please release any other related contract documents to The World for publishing.
Fred Kirby
Coos Bay
Related Posts:
LTE ~ North Bend Airport Manager Might be "Nuts"
LTE ~ One Very Confused Dick in Coos Bay
LTE ~ Coos Bay Privatization of Wastewater Treatment Plant for Overpriced Lawyers
LTE ~ Flat Income Tax vs FAIRtax
LTE ~ To the Citizens of Coos County
LTE ~ Matt Rowe the Only Candidate to Challenge the Authority of the BOC
LTE ~ Gurney & the Voters REJECTED the Finance Director/County Administrator
Coos County Marijuana Business Licensing Workshop Saturday April 2, 2016
Coos County Finance Director Job Classification & Title as of January 29, 2016
Coos County Treasurer Job Classification & Title as of October 11, 2015
LTE ~ Proponent Kissing Off Local Concerns About JCEP
LTE ~ More Transparency for the SCCF
Coos Bay School District Contract w/Superintendent Dawn Granger March 2014
LTE ~ Coos Bay School Board Ignoring Parents & Students
LTE ~ Leshley Still Uninformed
LTE ~ North Bend Airport Manager Might be "Nuts"
LTE ~ One Very Confused Dick in Coos Bay
LTE ~ Coos Bay Privatization of Wastewater Treatment Plant for Overpriced Lawyers
LTE ~ Flat Income Tax vs FAIRtax
LTE ~ To the Citizens of Coos County
LTE ~ Matt Rowe the Only Candidate to Challenge the Authority of the BOC
LTE ~ Gurney & the Voters REJECTED the Finance Director/County Administrator
Coos County Marijuana Business Licensing Workshop Saturday April 2, 2016
Coos County Finance Director Job Classification & Title as of January 29, 2016
Coos County Treasurer Job Classification & Title as of October 11, 2015
LTE ~ Proponent Kissing Off Local Concerns About JCEP
LTE ~ More Transparency for the SCCF
Coos Bay School District Contract w/Superintendent Dawn Granger March 2014
LTE ~ Coos Bay School Board Ignoring Parents & Students
LTE ~ Leshley Still Uninformed
RSS Feed
