Source: Christian Science Monitor "On Tuesday, the US Supreme Court [heard] oral arguments in a case that addresses what responsibility states have, or don’t have, in regulating pollution that ends up in other states' skies. Last year, the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit struck down an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) rule that required 28 upwind states in the South and Midwest to cut ozone and fine-particle emissions. The rule, which was finalized in 2011 but never went into effect, was intended to ease pollution blowing into states in the Mid-Atlantic and Northeast." [editor's note: About 80-some years ago, courts barred people from similar suits; will this change any of that? - SAT] (12/10/13)
http://tinyurl.com/newmb77
SCOTUS---The Supremes decline illegal NSA phone spying case
SCOTUS---The Supreme Court lets Oklahoma abortion law fail
SCOTUS---Narrow ruling in Michigan affirmative action case expected
SCOTUS---Anti-prostitution pledge in AIDS law violates free speech
SCOTUS---U.S. top court bars patents on human genes unless synthetic
SCOTUS---Supreme Court Allows Warrantless Collection of DNA by Police/5-4 Ruling
SCOTUS---The American Police State
SCOTUS showdown over Voting Rights Act
SCOTUS---Farmer vs. Monsanto
SCOTUS---Dog's sniff was up to snuff
Oregon Supreme Court decided to erode more of the 4th Amendment
SCOTUS refuses to hear “piracy” arguments
SCOTUS declines death penalty case
SCOTUS revives challenge to ObamaCare & rejects appeal of congressman
SCOTUS denies Ohio request to curtail early voting