Coos County Watchdog


  • Home >>>
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Links
    • Whistle-Blower’s Page
  • Blog >>>
    • Info Blogs
  • Issues >>>
    • Johnson Creek Dam
    • Jury Nullification >
      • Jury Nullification on Facebook
    • More Choices in Bandon
    • NO Bandon Marsh Expansion >
      • Bandon Marsh Expansion on Facebook
    • Second Amendment Sanctuary Ordinance >
      • S.A.S.O on FB
    • State of Jefferson >
      • State of Jefferson on Facebook
    • The Coos County Charter
    • Urban Renewal Information

BME Article by Mary Schamehorn

2/29/2012

Comments

 
By Mary Schamehorn
 Herald Editor
 A large group of people in Coos County, including several from Myrtle Point, attended a meeting last Friday night in Coquille to protest a proposal by  the US Fish and Wildlife Service to expand the Bandon Marsh National Wildlife Refuge.

 Many of those who spoke said the federal government already owns enough land in Oregon and they could see no reason to spend millions of dollars to purchase more.

 A map that has been widely circulated shows that all of the land on both sides of the Coquille River up to river mile 10.2 are being considered for expansion.

 One concern expressed repeatedly in the Coquille meeting and in a subsequent meeting with Congressman Ron Wyden was removing land from the tax rolls.


Assessor's info
The latest proposal to purchase land involves 154 distinct parcels comprising  4,567 acres,  according to information provided by Coos County Assessor Steve Jansen.

 Those parcels have a real market value of $24,524,243 and a total assessed value of just under $10 million.

 The gross property taxes off those lands is over $100,000 a year.

Port won't sell
 One group that has made it clear that they will not sell their land to USFWS is the Port of Bandon.


The Port voted unanimously at its December meeting not to sell its 80-acre parcel on the north spit of the Coquille River to become part of the Bandon Marsh National Wildlife Refuge (NWR).

 Several of the same landowners who spoke in Coquille attended the port meeting, urging commissioners not to sell their land.

 One of the major opponents was port commissioner Reg Pullen, an archaeologist, who said it's a matter of freedom.

 "There would be fewer opportunities for people to do things there if it was refuge property versus land owned by someone else," Pullen said.


"People use it to run their dogs, dig gravel, go rock hounding, hunting, fishing,  cutting firewood, picnicking on the river beach and so forth. They can drive right down to the water. We need to keep some places like that where  people can have that freedom.


"I love wildlife refuges, but I want to make sure there's a balance. I think  a mix of ownerships along the river is a healthy thing  — some lands  protected for the USFWS, and some lands protected for people to do what      
they want to do," Pullen said.


Fireworks targeted

He added that Bandon's annual Fourth of July fireworks display has been set off from the north spit for many years, and from the port's land for the past several years.


Referring to a study funded by USFWS on the impact of fireworks on offshore birds,   Pullen said the government "would probably like to see the fireworks  minimized or stopped. I'm a traditionalist and I know people love the  fireworks. I wouldn't want that to be lost."


Gina Dearth, port general manager, said staff recommended against selling the north spit parcel "now or at any time in the future."


USFWS officials are quick to point out that they will not condemn land or take it through eminent domain. They will only deal with willing sellers.


Expanded in 1999


In November 1999, USFWS announced that the approved boundary for the NWR had  been officially expanded by an additional 577 acres.


Established in 1983, Bandon marsh NWR included 304 acres of tidal wetlands and adjacent uplands in the lower Coquille River Estuary in and adjacent to the City of Bandon.


The refuge expansion area, east of Highway 101 (can be seen from Bullards Bridge) along the north bank of the Coquille River, included tidal wetlands, forested wetlands, lowland pastures, riparian corridors and      
upland habitats.


At  that time, USFWS spokesman Roy Lowe said the restoration of up to 400 acres of tidal wetlands .... would provide for compatible types of wildlife dependent recreation.


Never happened


But critics of the latest expansion say that never happened.


"We were told that they would allow duck and skeet shooting on that property,  but they won't allow any hunting," said Bandon city councilor Brian Vick.

He said hunting is allowed on the original refuge, but not on the 1999 expansion, which saw USFWS pay about a million dollars for the former Dave Philpott ranch, owned at that time by the Bussmann family.


And that's one reason he is adamantly opposing any further expansion.


Receives letter


Jill Halliburton, the former Jill Coffman who grew up in Myrtle Point, is one of the property owners who received a letter in November about the latest expansion


The letter points out that the USFWS (commonly referred to as the Service) is  developing a Comprehensive Conservation Plan (CCP) for the refuge.


"I want to emphasize two key points. First, the Service has initiated a study
       to possibly expand the boundary of the Refuge," said Roy Lowe, who works  
     out of the Oregon Coast National Wildlife Refuge Complex in Newport.


"The second key point is that you and other private landowners would not be    
   required to participate in any aspect of our land protection proposal      
(e.g. fee title purchase, conservation easement or agreement) regardless      
of where your land is located.


"Landowners within the expanded boundary would be under no obligation to sell their   
    property to the Service."


Some say that is all well and good, but if the government offers people enough 
      money, they undoubtedly will sell their property, effectively removing it  
     from the tax rolls.


"More than 4,500 acres is being requested, and you can see the writing on the   
    wall that more acreage up river is in the next phase," said Halliburton.     
  "Roy Lowe is quoted as saying 'when you restore a marsh, it's forever.'      
You can say the same thing about removing taxable property: once sold to      
any federal entity, it is forever off the tax rolls. It also will be      
forever unable to contribute to the county economy in anywhere near the      
previous volume.


"I can't fathom how the federal and state governments (our money) can justify
       removing that value from our taxable property in Coos county, much less   
    come up with funds to help 'restore' it, and still look us in the eye and    
   say they cannot come up with timber replacement money that was promised      
decades ago," she said.


$19 million in grants


In January 2011, Interior Secretary Ken Salazar  announced the award of      
more than $19 million to support 24 conservation projects benefiting fish      
and wildlife on more than 5,900 acres of coastal habitats in 12  states.


The Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board was awarded $1 million to help acquire 
      and restore approximately 622 acres of coastal wetlands in the Coquille  Valley ... for permanent conservation, protection and restoration by the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife.


"This project is the first phase of a larger initiative by ODFW to conserve and  restore approximately 3,000 acres in the lowlands along the lower Coquille River encompassing some of the most productive wetland habitats on the Oregon Coast. The total cost of the first phase is $2.506,000," according to the release from the Interior department.


"Protection and restoration of freshwater wetlands would complement downstream      
estuarine restoration efforts on Bandon National Wildlife Refuge.


About control


"Do not be mistaken: this effort to expand the marsh is not about the ecology.
       It's about control," said Halliburton. "As I look back on the last 30-40  
     years I can clearly see how we have very gradually lost control and      
therefore the choice to be able to make a living here in this beautiful      
corner of the state.


"Already over 60 percent of Coos County is in public ownership. Do we really want  
     to allow that number to grow?" asked Halliburton.

Comments

    Categories

    All
    A.F.P.
    Agenda 21
    Bandon
    B.I.A.
    B.L.M.
    Coos Bay
    Coos County
    Coos County
    Coquille
    County Charter
    Curry County
    C.W.A.
    Democratic Party
    D.E.Q.
    Eco Devo
    Eco Devo
    Economic Development
    Educational
    Elections
    E.P.A.
    F.D.A.
    F.E.M.A.
    Individual Rights
    I Spy Radio
    Jury Nullification
    Legislation
    Letter To Editor
    Mary Geddry
    N.D.A.A.
    News Wave
    N.O.A.A.
    North Bend
    O&C Land
    O.D.F.W.
    O.D.O.T.
    O.F.F.
    O.H.A.
    O.P.R.D.
    O.R.C. Mining
    O.W.E.B.
    P.E.R.S.
    Petitions
    Port Of Coos Bay
    Public Comments
    Public Events
    Regulation
    Republican Party
    S.A.O.V.A.
    State Of Jefferson
    The Bandon Marsh
    The Economy
    The Rob Taylor Report
    The Supreme Court
    The Tea Party
    Urban Renewal
    U.S.A.C.E.
    U.S.D.A.
    U.S.F.S
    U.S.F.W.S.

    Sign-Up Now to Stay Informed

    * indicates required

    View previous campaigns.

    Send Letters to:
    ​cooscountywatchdog@gmail.com​

    Disclaimer: Letters to the Editor and other opinions published in The Coos County Watchdog blog are not necessarily the views of the Editor, Publisher, or possible anyone else in their right mind.  The Watchdog reserves the right to edit, omit, or copy any and all submissions. 
    Letters to the Editor must be attributed with a name, address, and contact phone number. 

    WARNING:
    Political correctness is not practiced on this
    page & some content is inappropriate

    RSS Feed


    Archives

    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.
Photo used under Creative Commons from DieselDemon